Valid policy
One SPF record was found and its core syntax is usable. Continue reviewing every authorized sender and the expanded lookup count.
Inspect your SPF policy, default enforcement, deprecated mechanisms and DNS lookup budget.
SPF—Sender Policy Framework—is a TXT record that identifies services allowed to send mail using a domain’s envelope sender. Receiving systems compare the connecting IP address with mechanisms in the published policy, including ip4, ip6, include, a and mx.
A domain should publish one SPF policy beginning with v=spf1. Multiple records do not add together; they can produce a permanent error. Every legitimate sender must be represented in the single policy, directly or through a provider include, and the record should end with an intentional all mechanism such as -all or ~all.
SPF evaluation is limited to ten DNS-causing mechanisms and redirects. Nested include records count toward that budget, so a short-looking policy can still exceed the limit. SPF also authenticates the envelope domain rather than the visible From address, which is why DMARC alignment remains important.
The checker searches the submitted domain for values beginning with v=spf1.
It confirms that exactly one SPF policy exists for the domain.
Provider includes and redirects are followed within safety limits to estimate the lookup budget.
The final all mechanism, deprecated terms and authorization structure are translated into actionable findings.
One SPF record was found and its core syntax is usable. Continue reviewing every authorized sender and the expanded lookup count.
A ~all ending signals that unmatched senders should be treated as suspicious but not necessarily rejected. It can be useful during controlled transition.
A -all ending states that unmatched systems are unauthorized. Use it only after every legitimate sending service is represented.
Too many DNS-causing mechanisms can make SPF return permerror. Simplify providers or obtain a supported flattened strategy that is kept current.
Inventory transactional, support, billing and marketing senders, then publish one provider-approved record at the root domain.
Merge authorized mechanisms into a single v=spf1 value. Do not simply delete a record until you know which service depends on it.
Remove obsolete includes, ask providers for narrower authorization options, or use a maintained flattening approach with careful change monitoring.
PTR is deprecated, slow and unreliable for SPF authorization. Replace it with the explicit mechanism recommended by the sending provider.
Practical answers about this checker and the signal it evaluates.
Use the policy that matches your verified sender inventory and rollout stage. Hard fail is stronger, but an incomplete inventory can break legitimate delivery. DMARC reports can help validate sources before tightening SPF.
Traditional forwarding can change the connecting IP while preserving the original envelope domain, causing SPF to fail. DKIM may survive forwarding, and DMARC can pass when an aligned DKIM signature remains valid.
Yes. Each envelope-sender domain can publish its own SPF policy. A policy on example.com does not automatically define the policy for every subdomain.
The limit protects receivers from expensive or abusive recursive DNS evaluation. Include, a, mx, ptr, exists and redirect can trigger lookups; nested provider policies also count.